
Heuristic Analysis
Competitive Research
Google Analytics
Interviewing
Wireframing
Prototyping
Usability Testing
UI Design
The Michigan Poverty Law Center (MPLP) is a non-profit organization that trains and supports legal aid attorneys across the state.

Our initial meeting with our client gave us a sense of the scope of the project, as well as areas that they’d like to see improved. Their primary concern was making the resources and training section more streamlined and appealing to legal attorneys.
To familiarize ourselves with the website and identify potential issues, we started with a heuristic evaluation (an evaluation based on general rules-of-thumb for UX) through the website. This gave our team ideas of potential success and failure points within the website. We also did a competitive analysis with other legal websites such as Shriver Center on Poverty Law, Western Center on Poverty Law, Michigan Legal Help and Bet Tzedek. This analysis showed us ways we could potentially organize information on the website, such as through a tagging system and more clearly visible sub-sections.
This research gave us an idea on how to improve the website, but to create a truly useful experience, we needed to know what MPLP’s attorneys wanted from the website. We connected with attorneys affiliated with MPLP and asked them about their work needs and their habits when using the website. We also looked at Google Analytics to understand the website’s current performance and user behavioral patterns.
After recording our research, we organized our findings into individual sticky notes. We created an affinity board where sticky notes grouped together based on a shared theme. This grouping helped us identify common threads in our research, which in turn helped us target areas in the web design that we needed to improve. We then organized these improvement areas into an effort-impact matrix, so we could determine our design priorities.
Insights
Lack of Content Visibility
Attorneys were uncertain what the website provided outside of links to training, and as such they chose to rely on the listserv for their information. This reliance forced them to organize information on their own, or risk having the information buried in their emails.
The reason attorneys were uncertain of the value was because the existing resources were either hidden in blog articles and training or lacked strong visual cues. As such, attorneys were unaware that certain resources existed.
Cumbersome Log-In
Users needed to log-in to access materials, yet they were not allowed to have individual accounts. Instead, they were given a shared account with other attorneys; however, these shared accounts only applied to specific legal categories. If an attorney covered multiple fields, they would have to remember multiple passwords to access different parts of the site (and these were passwords they couldn’t control). This process made attorneys reluctant to use the website and burdened staff with repeat password requests.
Limited Organization
Even when users knew the site had the content they were looking for, they had difficulty finding that content. All content was organized chronologically, with no additional means of sorting results or refining searches.
Desire for Time-Saving Resources
Research was a core part of MPLP user workloads. Multiple users reported wanting a hub for information retrieval. According to Google Analytics data, one of the most high-traffic pages was a blog article about Snap Benefit updates; which suggested that users are interested in receiving urgent updates through the website. If the website could readily provide pertinent legal information and tools to simplify the work for attorneys, then it will become an asset for our users.




Usability Testing
Before we could recommend our design to our client, we needed to verify that it was effective. We decided to do a usability test with users and non-users to see if the website was easy to learn and appropriate for attorney needs. I conducted tests with three of the 7 participants.
We asked them to complete the following tasks:
Create an account
Locate information about MPLP’s mission and impact
Register for a Racial Justice Collaborative training
Find a template for a Consumer Law complaint form
Locate the article on noncitizen access to public benefits in Michigan
Download the video recording of the last consumer law meeting
Refinements
Based on the testing feedback, I made the following refinements to my pages.
Resources Page:
Instead of a drop-down for ‘upcoming’ and ‘past’ filters, I instead used a ‘pill filter’ approach for better visibility.
To accommodate the potentially high volume of documents, I replaced the collapsible menus within the documents tab with pill filter buttons to save space.
Search Page:
Rather than emphasizing the word ‘search’ on the top bar, a magnifying glass should be leveraged for better user recognition of the function.
We also need to improve the contrast of the labels, either through scale, bolding, and/or coloring, so that they become noticeable.
The MPLP team praised our work and said that they would move forward with our design and recommendations, and that they would expand their developer team to get the work done.
Overall, this project was If time permitted, I would have liked to have conducted more tests with attorneys, with multiple tests involving the mobile version of the website.





